https://illinoisrighttolife.org/surprising-realities-of-organ-donation-and-brain-death
Surprising Realities of Organ Donation and Brain Death
Avatar
Illinois Right To Life Team
October 26, 2015
Imagine lying in a hospital unable to communicate in any way. You can hear, but you can’t move even the smallest muscle or make any sound.
Now imagine hearing doctors say your spouse is being “completely unreasonable” by refusing to donate your organs. You’re brain dead, you hear. Other patients need your organs.
Jennifer Hamann owes her life to her completely unreasonable husband. Jenny had been diagnosed with epilepsy at 25. Medication prescribed for an unrelated illness turned out to be contraindicated for epilepsy, and it triggered her first grand mal seizures. Twice she was resuscitated, and she was left comatose.
Doctors were eager to harvest her organs, but Jenny was not brain dead. After three weeks she woke up. Over the next year she fully recovered. Afterward she became a nurse, inspired during the coma by some of the nurses who cared for her. “I was the recipient of good nursing care and not so good,” she said. “I wanted to be one of the good ones.”
To the not-so-good ones, “I wasn’t a person,” she said. “I was a body they were forced to take care of.” She heard a nurse call for help to “turn this thing,” and a doctor called her a “young, healthy specimen.”
Jenny’s experience is not unique. The sanctity of human life is on a collision course with the medical community’s willingness—even eagerness—to declare a patient brain dead and harvest his or her organs. In the US, organ donation led to 28,000 transplants in 2013, about 79 patients per day. But another 18 patients died each day “due to a shortage of donated organs.”[1] Clearly demand far exceeds supply.
As transplant expertise advances, the demand for organs grows. Some countries now use an opt-out system; unless a person specifically registers objection to being a donor, permission is assumed. In a study published September 2014, researchers looked at organ donation rates in 48 countries from 2000 to 2012, specifically studying kidneys and livers. Twenty-three countries used opt-in systems, including the United States, and 25 used opt-out. Researchers expected opt-out to produce higher donation rates, and their hypothesis proved true.[2]
These results are not surprising, given that opt-out makes organ donation the default. If a person wants to be an organ donor, no action is needed. On the other hand, if people avoid thoughts of death and delay opting out or simply never consider the question, the decision is made for them. If one does nothing, whether by ignorance, delay or choice, he or she is automatically a donor.
The default may carry additional authority if perceived as public policy or a social good. Organizations such as Recycle Yourself promote the latter. The Recycle Yourself website offers t-shirts and other “goodies” as well as Scalpel Pal, a “fun and interactive way” to learn about organ donation by playing “cool games” with friends on Facebook.
Even with opt-out consent, however, supply lags behind demand. Spain has the world’s highest rate of organ donation, but that was not always true. Despite using opt-out for a decade, Spain did not see a significant rise in donations until it introduced a transplant coordination network, placing procurement teams in hospitals and promoting organ donation among the public.
Such hospital-based teams—the “Spanish Model”—are now common. Certified Organ Procurement Organizations are active in all 50 US states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. Their function is two-fold: “increasing the number of registered donors” and “coordinating the donation process when actual donors become available.”[3]
Interestingly, donation rates in France and Brazil fell under an opt-out system, an outcome attributed partly to mistrust of the medical community. The researchers also considered mistrust a factor in the United Kingdom’s decision to stay with opt-in consent. While the UK “reveres” its National Health Service (NHS), the system’s “shortcomings and failures” and financial realities are clear. Said Bruce Keogh, medical director of NHS England, “Medicine has become much more advanced, has become more complex and more effective, but importantly, it has also become more expensive.” Britain is “gripped in the quadruple pincer of increasing demand, escalating costs, a set of rising expectations, all in a constrained financial environment.”[4] That pincer is also inevitable as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act—Obamacare—works itself out in the United States.
Given the cost of care and rehabilitation for brain-injured patients and the lucrative business of organ transplantation, the public is wise to be wary of the brain-death diagnosis, says Angela Clemente, a forensic analyst who consults for congressional investigations. Organ donation carries a connotation of generosity. Donations regularly make feel-good headlines, especially if the victim-donor is young. According to Clemente, an organ procurement team often knows the patient will be declared brain dead before the family knows.
When families are numb with grief and shock, the idea that their loved one may somehow live on through donation may offer comfort. Procurement teams are well aware of families’ vulnerability. They also are aware of families’ ignorance about brain death.
In August 1968, an ad hoc committee of Harvard Medical School published a report to redefine brain death, or irreversible coma. Death had long been defined by cessation of cardio-respiratory function, but medical advances made it possible to maintain those functions artificially. The committee itself signaled the controversy its definition would create in terms of patient care, family concerns, finite resources and transplants:
Improvements in resuscitative and supportive measures have led to increased efforts to save those who are desperately injured. Sometimes these efforts have only partial success so that the result is an individual whose heart continues to beat but whose brain is irreversibly damaged. The burden is great on patients who suffer permanent loss of intellect, on their families, on the hospitals, and on those in need of hospital beds already occupied by these comatose patients. Obsolete criteria for the definition of death can lead to controversy in obtaining organs for transplantation.[5]
The diagnosis remains highly subjective. Any physician can determine brain death in most US states, but laws differ by state and even by institution. Some require the physician to have specialized expertise; others don’t.[6]
Theresa Dampf, a registered nurse whose patients are transplant recipients or potential recipients, recalled in-service seminars where instructors said patients have to be “100 percent brain dead.” She asked for clarification, noting that patients with as much as 50 percent brain function had been declared brain dead. Clarification was not forthcoming.
“Death occurs when life is absent,” said Paul Byrne, MD, who practiced 55 years and is president of the Life Guardian Foundation. “Life is gone with the destruction of three major systems: circulatory, respiratory and brain.”
A physician may observe the absence of brain function, he noted, but function may not be gone. A damaged brain is slow to respond and slow to heal.
Diagnoses other than brain death may or may not be more accurate. For example, neurosurgeons first described persistent vegetative state in 1972, meaning patients have autonomic function controlled by the brain stem, such as heartbeat and respiration, but not higher functions such as thought and reason. Life Issues Institute takes exception to the language on its face—people are not vegetables—but in any case a study by London’s Royal Hospital for Neurodisability found the diagnosis to be wrong in 43 percent of cases.[7]
Another diagnosis, minimally conscious state (MCS), was described in 2002. MCS patients sometimes recover, even after years.
The diagnoses are fluid. A patient who appears to have only autonomic function may continue thus until the state is considered persistent but also could reach MCS. An MCS patient may retreat to only autonomic function. The timeframe for diagnosis depends on the cause of injury, whether oxygen deprivation or trauma. In the former, an autonomic-only state is considered permanent after three months; in the latter, 12 months is needed.[8]
Yet families often face pressure for organ donation within days of injury. If the patient is not a registered donor, Clemente noted, procurement teams may talk with family members separately to see if they disagree about donation. If so, the hospital’s ethics committee can step in and make the decision. The team may wait until a grieving family member is alone to push for donation.
Also, said Dampf, a family’s consent may not be informed consent. One common misconception is that the patient draws a last breath, the heart stops beating and the family is given time to say goodbye. In reality, organs are useless for transplantation after only four or five minutes without blood flow. For organs to be viable, the patient must be breathing and the heart must be pumping. The harvest can’t wait for death as the public perceives death.
Families may have few options, Dampf said, because once doctors declare a patient brain dead, insurance companies can refuse to pay for treatment after a specified period. Yet stories abound of “brain dead” patients who later recovered to varying degrees.
Caution on the side of life is the humane course. “When you are dealing with patients who seem not to be aware, you must treat them as if they are,” said Jenny Hamann. “You can’t know.”
By: Sherry Pinson
<<<…These folks have been stealing organs for a very long time whether someone wanted to be an donor or not.
quote …”If the patient is not a registered donor, Clemente noted, procurement teams may talk with family members separately to see if they disagree about donation. If so, the hospitals ethics committee can step in and make the decision….”
quote “…Jenny’s experience is not unique. The sanctity of human life is on a collision course with the medical community’s willingness—even eagerness—to declare a patient brain dead and harvest his or her organs.
…Given the cost of care and rehabilitation for brain-injured patients and the lucrative business of organ transplantation, the public is wise to be wary of the brain-death diagnosis, says Angela Clemente, a forensic analyst who consults for congressional investigations. Organ donation carries a connotation of generosity. Donations regularly make feel-good headlines, especially if the victim-donor is young.
According to Clemente, an organ procurement team often knows the patient will be declared brain dead before the family knows.
When families are numb with grief and shock, the idea that their loved one may somehow live on through donation may offer comfort. Procurement teams are well aware of families’ vulnerability. They also are aware of families’ ignorance about brain death.
…Theresa Dampf, a registered nurse whose patients are transplant recipients or potential recipients, recalled in-service seminars where instructors said patients have to be “100 percent brain dead.” She asked for clarification, noting that patients with as much as 50 percent brain function had been declared brain dead. Clarification was not forthcoming.
….A physician may observe the absence of brain function, he noted, but function may not be gone. A damaged brain is slow to respond and slow to heal….”
quote The Fulfillment of the “WHITE HORSE” Prophecy
The RETURN OF JESUS THE CHRIST
…The Prophecies of the Psalms may give us a timeline. If that is the case the Prophecies of Psalms covers the 1900’s until 2013. It may take that long before the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth and the 1000 Years of Peace will be fully prepared and the Lord Jesus the Christ comes to enter into the Temple of the New JerUSAlem in the Land of Manasseh as described by Ezekiel. The Blue prints. The Temple for Jesus will be completed. A joint venture between the forces of heaven and those bringing forth the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth during the great Tribulation….
<<<…Except for Max in the article Nursing Homes Use Guardianship as a Tool for Profit the people I speak of below are members of my own family and I am going to tell you some things that have been done to them.
None of the people mentioned below were considered brain dead but you may know someone is is/was and stealing organs from people is being done. Hospice is part of their Eugenics program. I don’t know how many people remember this but following September 11th, 2001, they started promoting Euthanasia and Hospice on the news. They started using people like Terry Shavio to justify their ‘right to die’. Then the next thing you know, Hospice became a household word. Not only do they sicken these people to begin with but they also were manipulating these people and their family to allow Hospice to put them out of their misery so they don’t suffer anymore. They sicken them, medically tortured them, then kill them.
They are euthanising people who don’t want to be euthanised. They give them meds that make them sound like they are crazy as well as using morphine to keep them unconscious so they can’t voice their concerns about what is being done to them. The Nazi’s love the fact that families are literally handing over their sick family members to them to be ‘put down’. This was all carefully orchestrated to meet a desired outcome. Then they steal their organs.
I know this lady who was told she had cancer. She was also told that she might live another year or two. There was nothing wrong with her mind and she was quite capable of knowing whether she was in pain or not. This lady was my mother. When her family were there at the hospital with her she told them she was not in any pain. Next thing you know, the nurse came in and gave her pain medicine, and this pain medicine just happened to make her look and sound like she was crazy. When they asked the nurse why she gave her this medicine when she wasn’t in any pain, the nurse said that she was in pain but that she didn’t know she was! WTF! After being given this pain medicine this woman was acting like a stark raving lunatic. They gave this woman this medicine because it was another way of making sure couldn’t make her own decisions.
The medical community is really good at doing things like this. This lady was eventually sent home and Hospice took over. The hospice folks delivered the medical equipment to her home for Hospice. She went through radiation treatment and started chemotherapy. Her legs swelled up and her hair fell out. They loaded her up with morphine so that she would sleep and wouldn’t be a problem for anybody and they withheld food and water from her. This woman did not want this. Her husband was kind of annoyed being saddled with a ‘sick’ wife and didn’t want to spend the next year or two taking care of a sick wife. He was ready to move on with his new life.
The Dutch nurse gave her morphine, withheld water and food from her, and waited for her to die. This is Terminal Sedation. The Dutch are quite skilled at this. My mother did not want to be euthanized. She didn’t want to be killed but they did it to her anyway.
Euthanasia is the Standard of Care. It doesn’t matter if you could have lived another year or two. But the interesting thing was, awhile after she died, someone from the military medical community told me that this lady didn’t have cancer. She had Lymes Disease which is a Mycoplasma Infection.
www.godlikeproductions.com
lillie8
User ID: 689157
8/19/2009 7:43 AM
Re: Britain’s Doctors Practicing Slow Euthanasia Through Deep Sedation Quote
Dutch doctors prefer “terminal sedation” to lethal medications, according to a survey by Nijmegan University. Under this system, all treatment, food and water are withheld from heavily sedated patients until they die. Its detractors describe it as “slow euthanasia” since the intention of the doctor is to kill the patient.
Pain control expert Bernardus Crul said that better care for the dying in the Netherlands and advances in pain control had now made terminal sedation a viable alternative. “Most doctors no longer see euthanasia as a medical necessity for fighting unbearable suffering and that the solution of terminal sedation is suitable for that,” he told the Dutch Evangelical Broadcasting Network.
The idea had a frosty reception in Australia from both sides of the debate. Euthanasia campaigner Dr Philip Nitschke said that it put doctors in control of dying rather than patients. “No one has every come to my [assisted suicide] workshops and said I want to spend five days dying slowly,” he told The Age. The president of New South Wales Doctors for Life Catherine Lennon said that it was just another form of euthanasia and that patients should beware of “unethical doctors” who might be willing to use it. ~ The Age, May 30; Reuters, May 29
<<<..All these folks are supporters of Euthanasia and have been killing people this way for a very long time.
I’m sure you are familiar with the Powers of Attorneys – Advanced Directives they keep pushing on people. I have since had the opportunity to look over these forms, and I have had personal experience with them too.
One of my brothers was admitted to a hospital in West Chester, Pa. They asked him if he wanted a Power of Attorney or Advanced Directive and he said yes thinking he was giving our sister medical power of attorney to make medical decisions for him. When he underwent surgery, they put a ventilator tube down his throat. They said he didn’t really need it, but they put it in place ‘just in case’. After surgery, they kept the tube in his throat and kept him half awake and half asleep with his hands tied to the bed so he wouldn’t pull the tube out. They said they wanted to make sure he kept breathing with his own lungs. The doctor said he had every intention of removing the ventilator tube in a couple days. This man knew what was happening and he tried to communicate things to his family but wasn’t really able to.
The family was told that this man could live another six months, maybe a year or even two. He didn’t want to die. Over the weekend another doctor showed up. The doctor told them that he wanted to remove him from life support though he was not on it because he needed it. He could breathe just fine on his own and they knew that. This doctor started with saying ‘Do you want him to suffer’? DO YOU? DO YOU?
I told the doctor that my brother had a right to be woken up and to make whatever decision he wanted to about his medical care and his life. I had argued with this doctor because we had been told that there wasn’t any reason my brother couldn’t breathe on his own, and they had always intended to take the tube out. We were told that they only put the tube in as a precaution in case something happened during surgery. Well, according to THIS doctor, the Advanced Directive, or power of attorney that this man had signed, stated something about if one had a terminal illness, or no hope of recovery, then that patient would be treated according to Medical Standard of Care. The doctor was the only who could make those decisions, and he decided he was going to euthanize this man. The Standard of Care was Euthanasia.
They already had him unconscious, but doctor still injected something into his IV. It took his heart about a half hour to stop beating but I don’t believe he was really dead. They can’t take the organs of someone who is dead. During that time the doctor made the comment that “his healthy young heart just doesn’t want to stop beating”.
And we knew where that healthy young heart went!
They hastened my brother’s death in order to take his organs. There are certain drugs that can be given to people to slow their heart rate and breathing down and they would have had to do that because he still has to be alive to take his organs.
Those Advanced Directives and other medical power of attorney forms need to be looked at real close because they don’t always say what you think they do. People are told that these forms allow you to designate someone to make medical decisions for you and you have the right to decide what treatment you want in case of something happening to you but nobody tells you that the wording in the document you are signing actually takes those decisions away from you or the person you chose to make those decisions for you. The medical ‘professionals’ can intervene and treat you according to Medical Standards of Care. You sure as hell don’t want to give these doctors and nurses the power to make those decisions for you. The Standard of Care is Terminal Sedation. To Euthanize you.
I know of another man who allegedly collapsed on the street one day. He was another one of my brothers. Our family was told that he was being taken to Brandywine Hospital in Coatesville, Pa. When we got their employees at the hospital told us that they don’t know if our brother was there. Every time the family asked, we were told the same thing, and this went on for hours. The hospital was lying to the family. It wasn’t until hours later, after the ‘autopsy’ had been performed, that the hospital admitted he was there. The family believes the hospital had taken this man’s organs and didn’t want us to know our brother was there until they were done taking his organs. The hospital didn’t want the family to interfere or refuse to give up his organs, so they took them before we were even told that he was in that hospital.
Euthanasia has become a household name and practice and they wanted it to look like the public accepted it. And that is just one of the many ways they did it. Though none of those people spoken of above were said to be braindead the next article is pretty interesting.
https://myelder.com/nursing-homes-use-guardianship-as-tool-to-profit
Nursing Homes Use Guardianship as Tool to Profit
Published: 30 Sep
By: Jack Halpern
For some families, the golden years are turning nightmarish, thanks to state laws that some nursing homes are using to try to gain guardianship — and financial control — of their older patients.
Max Kaplan has been residing in a Bronx Nursing Home since 2011. He is of both sound body and mind. He does not need a nursing home. He is not ill, nor does he need any medication. He is one of the unlucky elders who has been adjudicated as an “incapacitated person,” unable to manage his personal affairs, medical situation, or his finances. Max worked hard most of his eighty years. He has no family, earned enough money to buy a small home, and put away a few dollars for retirement. His house was not in good repair, but he managed to get by.
In 2011 he went into the hospital for a minor surgical procedure. He never saw his home again. The hospital told Max that for them to discharge him back to his home, he would have to agree to allow a social worker to visit his home to determine if it was safe for him to return. Although everything in his home was in working order, the social worker determined that some repairs were needed and that he could not return home. She called Adult Protective Services, who agreed that Max could not return home.
Max was sent to the Bronx nursing home for physical and occupational therapy, which he did not need. The hospital promised that after spending two weeks in the nursing home, he could go home to arrange for repairs, which he agreed to make.
When Max was admitted to the nursing home, he refused therapy and insisted that he be allowed to go home. After two weeks, he was not allowed to return home. He tried to leave the building. The facility administrator called the police who were informed that Max was mentally incapacitated and had nowhere to go. The nursing home filed an Article 81 petition to have a guardian appointed for Max, an “alleged incapacitated person.”
A guardian must be a person or entity, it cannot be a nursing home. Max was assigned a non-profit entity to become his guardian. Some of these entities are considered guardianship mills.
The guardian allowed the facility to apply for Medicaid, took his $50,000 nest egg to pay privately for nursing home services Max did not ask for or need, sold his home and furniture, and took his social security and pension payment to pay for his care. He is allowed $50.00 monthly for personal incidentals.
Except for court appearances, Max is not allowed to leave the building for any reason. No one can sign him out; a right allowed all nursing home residents. His guardian is not responsive.
Guardianship abuse is worse than identity theft from which one can recover. A guardianship is a life sentence.
Guardianship is one of the most ethically fraught aspects of the eldercare system, hinging on the most sensitive questions about personal liberty, medical responsibility, and kinship. And it all starts, for better or worse, with a judge’s decree. A court appoints a guardian when a senior is deemed unable to live independently, usually after a hearing process that reviews an individual’s medical needs or physical, intellectual, mental or psychological disabilities, and determines that guardianship is appropriate. Similar to adoption, the guardian is, in most cases, a relative or friend who petitions for them. But people with fewer resources might end up in the care of a public or private agency, which is tasked with managing issues like medical treatment, financial planning and end-of-life care.
Many attorneys who represent nursing homes, use New York’s guardianship statute, codified as Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law (MHL), for financial reasons.
Using guardianship to collect a debt owed by an incapacitated person is antithetical to the language and spirit of Article 81. From the legislative findings and the purpose as set forth in MHL § 81.01, through the final provision on post-death proceedings, the statute is there to protect the Alleged Incapacitated Person (AIP). What is not beyond dispute, however, is how and when nursing homes can permissibly resort to guardianship to protect their incapacitated residents.
Last month, the United States Senate Committee on Aging called for a major overhaul in the guardianship system, warning that “unscrupulous guardians” have used their position to get control of vulnerable people and then “liquidate assets and savings for their own personal benefit.” It can take many years, if ever for this system to change.
In New York, anyone can petition to have someone declared incapacitated. A judge may then appoint a family member or a third party, usually a lawyer, to be guardian over the person’s physical needs, financial affairs, or both. Critics of guardianship say these strangers have open license to raid their wards’ estates.
Today, nursing homes are filing for guardianships for several reasons including:
- Keeping their census high- As more elders choose to stay at home or go to assisted living facilities; nursing homes have to keep their beds filled. Since nursing homes can’t apply for Medicaid payments, the facility needs to get paid when Medicare dollars run out (usually 100 days). If a resident has a family who is willing to go through the onerous application process, that is fine. What happens if the family is uncooperative, or there is no family? A guardian has the power to file a Medicaid Application.
- Keeping residents in their facilities against their will– As you see from my case study on Mr. Kaplan, a facility can force someone to stay if that person is declared incapacitated and unable to make their own decisions. Once a guardian is appointed, he/she takes over decision making in medical matters. If the facility makes a case with the guardian that a resident needs to be in a nursing home, the guardian has the power to keep that resident in a nursing home.
- Bar complaining relatives from visiting their loved ones- This especially egregious guardianship abuse is very commonplace today in many nursing homes across the country. While the nursing home visitation regulations are unambiguous on who may visit a resident, substandard nursing homes don’t like those pesky relatives who are always complaining and advocating for their loved ones, seeking better care.
On the pretense that these family members are disruptive and dangerous to the health and welfare of the resident and the facility, they bar them from visiting. For the most part, these family members have a power of attorney and health care proxy so they can make decisions for their loved one. A court-appointed guardian can usurp these legal abilities and continue to bar the family from visiting.
- Evicting residents – Nursing home evictions are on the rise. Last year alone, 12,000 residents were evicted from nursing homes. The number is significantly higher, considering that this crime goes mostly unreported. A guardian can force a resident to move out of a facility, even to a facility hundreds of miles from their family….
quote “…Last month, the United States Senate Committee on Aging called for a major overhaul in the guardianship system, warning that “unscrupulous guardians” have used their position to get control of vulnerable people and then “liquidate assets and savings for their own personal benefit.” It can take many years, if ever for this system to change.
In New York, anyone can petition to have someone declared incapacitated. A judge may then appoint a family member or a third party, usually a lawyer, to be guardian over the person’s physical needs, financial affairs, or both. Critics of guardianship say these strangers have open license to raid their wards’ estates….”
<<<….As always, once these families are done using these guardianship laws for their own purposes, they ‘reform’ their guardianship system. It’s always after the dirty work is done but it doesn’t do any good anyway. The problem with the system is that nobody is ever accountable. The lawyers and judges are corrupt, and the guardians are never held accountable. It is a corrupt system, and it can’t be fixed by ‘reforming’ it because the court system is corrupt.
The families responsible like to use the organizations they create to carry out these activities. They use their courts, for instance, and hold guardianship hearings to take control of as many older people, disabled people and their assets as they can. They put people in nursing homes against their will. They work with social services agencies in hospitals to take control of even more elderly people. At this time, I believe the courts are ‘managing’ two billion dollars’ worth of assets. They like taking control of people’s assets. So, what are they going to do with these assets? It’s not like the person is going to cancel the guardianship, leave the nursing home and reclaim their assets.
Anytime you see a group of do-gooders taking control of other peoples lives then it’s a problem.
When they are done using these organizations for their own purposes then they like to ‘reform’ them. But what they are doing is not reform. The courts are growing these organizations in order to take control of even more elderly people and disabled.
http://community.webtv.net/alienlunch/ALIENLUNCH
—–Original Message—–
From: Fritz Springmeier
Date: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:19 PM
Subject: Significant apology by Big Brother
This went out to our list last June, 2002
NAZI EUGENICS POLICIES STARTED IN 1917 IN USA, OREGON
Oregonian Special Report – Facing the Shame
The following Oregonian Special Report reveals that the programs now in place enforcing National Corporate Socialism, have had an entrenched agenda in the USA, and in particular Oregon, since the turn of the century.
Variations of this abuse are in place right now, programs called different names and criminal abuse stil covered up. The same slander, bias, assessment without supporting evidence is used every day to incarcerate people and take their children and steal their assets and estates. The state says it, the judge signs it, and from then on you have a judicial lie that no one is “allowed” to confront or challenge.
It is amazing to learn that the policies used by Hitler were DEVELOPED in the USA and in Oregon ! Again, we are fed a prejudice and the people buy into it, to deceive and keep us off point that our own government is the perpetrator of an extremely evil agenda to control the people, now global. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT – SUSTAINABILITY just two of the words for these programs….
We have also learned that after World War II that the “doctors” who perpetrated these schemes and programs in Nazi Germany, were brought to the USA afterwards and set up in the teaching universities all over america. Here they developed the mind control techniques and technologies that we are all living with now, with technologies and databases they could not even dream of.
The same method used to slander and prejudice to set up people without Law is in effect today, and the state routinely uses its doctors to “evaluate” any who would stand against the state to exercise their inherent rights. We personally have experienced the judge writing “get a mental health eval” on an order, without needing any supporting reason. This evaluation is the first door to hell, and to refuse it is jailable contempt for refusing a judicial order. Either way, you are doomed after these malicious reports are manufactured against you, a permanent record, also used to take your children.
We have seen three people ordered to the mental hospital by corrupt judges, kept incarcerated and abused for months at a time, in the jail and in the hospital. The jugde orders the defendant to use a state prostitute “doctor” who wrote in these cases, “patient has prosecutorial delusions for believing the judge is corrupt”.
As you read this article, remember that right now it has come to light that not only are the courts sentencing people without crime to mental hospitals if they refuse the judges order, they are putting them in jail instead of the hospital. Recently the Oregon Supreme Court said this violates the rights of people, yet the Attorney General appealed this and they are continuing this abuse right now. That the “Justice Dept” appealed this RIGHT decision of the Supreme Court to immediately get these people out of the jails, the Attorney General takes a position in court to KEEP THEM THERE and not be liable. This is the normal routine of the agencies protecting each other in the courts.
Once in the system, most people are completely helpless to get themselves out, and this is a favorite for judicial vendettas and for BAR members to order the demise of their enemies. They know all they have to do is file a bogus Complaint, or a restraining order, on anonymous allegations, and once the people are brought into court, the “court” is a foregone conclusion that the psych eval will be ordered. The attonorney and the prosecutor have already met with the judge beforehand. Then they send a letter to their doctor, whom they insist the defendant goes to, and the rest is method and operation. ANYONE can be “found” to be “feeble minded” and judges do this every day to keep the prisons filled and the system SUSTAINABLE. Then they take, STEAL all the assets of the people and “liquidate” them.
Right now the Dept of Human Resources biggest program is federal money to teach their caseworkers ASSET MANAGEMENT. Ask WHY would they need to know this, a legal term for converting the property and belongings of the elderly they “help” once they “assess” them for the state to “determine the interest” or how much the state can make off each case. Also, now they compel contracts on the elderly and have made “new rules” so the state can take the money for these compelled contracts from the estate after the person is DEAD. Also, they are teaching these caseworkers legal process so that they write better fabricated documents to be used to convert the assets. Ask also WHY is the federal government involved in MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT AND HOME OWNERSHIP AND MANAGING ALL OUR MORTGAGES? WE KNOW NOW THEY HAVE STOLEN IT ALL.
ALL OF THIS IS RELEVANT TO THE SAME CORE ISSUE, THAT THE SYSTEMIC FRAUD HAS ENSLAVED THE PEOPLE, IS AGRESSIVELY ENFORCING ITS OUTLAW POLICIES AND IS ENFORCED BY THE BAR JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS IN EVERY OFFICE AND BRANCH.
In 1910 the attorneys and legislators forged the Oregon Constitution and created the “Amended VII” counterfeit legislative judicial system, and incorporated the corporate national socialist agenda in the designs for total control and management by the “money priests”, private corporate interests calling itself “government”, in Oregon.
We note that it states that Governor Oswald West signed the genocide bill. West is also the governor who implemented the Amended VII Fraud, starting in 1911. They change the words to be politically correct, constantly revising the language “fixes” in the legislature.
Later these policies have been called “pioneering land use laws” and then “Oregon Shines; Benchmarks Goals 2000”, the “Infant First! Database”, and the “Justice 2020 Administrative courts”, just to name a few.
….Gov. Kitzhabers whole operation protects these criminals in offices acting to abuse and exploit the people. He has taken these NAZI policies to new heights with the Oregon Childrens Plan, to ASSESS and INTERVENE in every family through their firstborn newborn babies. The genocide has not changed, what changed was the abortion “laws”, and so the state “manages” the people now through forced/coerced abortions and seizures of newborns….. same elitists buying and controlling all the other “lesser” humans. POVERTY is a major factor in the whole agenda. the vultures target the poor for all these exploitation programs for federal money.
These self righteous abusers in the early years would have dreamed of the databases that the state is using now to “assess and evaluate” and track every man, woman and child from birth. We know first hand of the horrific sexual abuse being perpetrated by child services “assessment centers” and “evaluators” – the foster children say these “counsellors” are the worst pedohiles and abuse them in ways beyond description. This is going on right now to countless children and disabled people who are routiney drugged to make them complaint. rendered “adoptable” or “manageable”. AS ONE CHILD SAID “THERE IS NO LOVE IN THE FOSTER HOMES OR INSTITUTIONS.”
Again, as always, with accountability in the courts, prosecution of public servants who violate the rights of the people, and an enlightened public, none of these people can get away with these schemes.
Also keep in mind the horrendous records that are opened up fifty years later – right now we cannot get any agency to appear in a courtroom in Oregon, and answer ANY public right to know. In trials, the judges obstruct justice and stop all questioning in this regard, no matter how plain and right the case is presented. We can only imagine the depravities that they are engaging in right at this moment and we are being PREVENTED in court from finding out !!!!! We are witnessing personally unbelievable violations of every semblence of law, yet no one yet will “get real” and allow us to “bring forth remedy”.
WAKE UP AMERICA !!!!
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN IN PLACE SPECIFICALLY FOR THE LAST HUNDRED YEARS – THE FIRST WORLD WAR WAS TO INCORPORATE THE WORLD AND THEN THE DEPRESSION WAS TO PUT THE MACHINE IN PLACE AND STEAL ALL THE ALLODIAL TITLES, STEAL ALL THE HOMES FOR THE RICH TO INVEST THEIR MONEY IN …..
THEN THEY “GAVE” CORPORATIONS “LEGAL RIGHTS” IN THE COURTS THAT IMITATE INHERENT RIGHTS, AND CHARTERS TO BECOME “ARMS” AND “ORGANS” THAT FORM FICTIONAL “BODIES” WITHOUT OVERSIGHT OR END ….. THE ROBOTS ARE RUNNING THE MACHINE, NOT PEOPLE, AND THE MONEY IS ITS BLOOD.
NOTHING IS REAL THAT THEY HAVE PERPETRATED – THE MONEY THAT APPEARS TO BE EVAPORATING AT THIS TIME NEVER EXISTED ! THE VAULT IN OREGON HAS BEEN EMPTY FOR YEARS AND NO ONE ANYWHERE OR IN THE ARCHIVES CAN SAY WHERE THE STATE GOLD WENT OR WHO TOOK IT, BUT THE ROOM WAS FILLED AT ONE TIME TO THE CEILING WITH THE PEOPLES STATE GOLD RESERVES.
YOU OWN NOTHING AT THIS TIME IN THIS SYSTEM – HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT – COMMUNITY OWNED AND MANAGED FAMILIES – LICENSED PEOPLE – SUBSIDIZED FAMILES – SUSTAINABILITY ONLY BASED ON $$$ VALUE AND PRODUCTIVITY – I.E. SLAVERY TO THIS CORPORATE SYSTEM
Pamela Gaston
A Voice For Children
<<<<…What she says is true, but unfortunately, this stuff is written and ‘revealed’ by the same people that are doing it. Pam Gaston is either someone who is helping these families ‘reveal all that was hidden’ or that is a phony name for one of these family members. They waited many years, and hid these activities, until they were sure that everything, they wanted to do was done, and everyone they targeted was taken care of. Then after Sept 11th, they began to reveal all that they had done. The courts have always been corrupt and that’s because the courts are controlled by the Genoese / Genovese families who were once known as the Nazi Elite. Today they are referred to as Organized Crime families. The Nazi Elite are multigenerational families.
I’m going to tell you a little bit about a case having to do with Guardianship, but I am going to use different names or initials for some of the parties involved.
Spouses who are divorcing other spouses are not supposed to be given Guardianship of the other spouse for obvious reasons. These spouses have a tendency to not provide the services that are needed to help the other spouse resulting in lifelong ‘incapacitation’ and often times death, and they also like to steal the other spouses’ assets. In this case this is what was happening. The courts aren’t supposed to give the divorcing spouse Guardianship, but they do even knowing that the injured/incapacitated spouse may not survive at the hands of the guardians. The courts also allow these spouses to steal the other spouses’ assets. Janet and I had known Mike for almost fifty years and would have been the best Guardians for Mike but they gave Guardianship to his estranged spouse Tonia and his son Mack instead.
The spouse who got Guardianship, we will call Tonia and the second Guardian was Mike’s son Mack. The spouse she/they were given Guardianship of is Mike. Tonia was divorcing Mike. I don’t think Tonia was too happy with the fact that Mike was finally happy and that he and his girlfriend had planned to get married when the divorce was final. At the time of Mike’s accident in 2020 Mike and Tonia had been separated for appx two years and had just finished working out the settlement for their divorce. Tonia had stolen money from a GoFundMe account to pay for her legal fees for the Guardianship hearing. At that time, it cost approximately $4000-$5000 dollars to start a Guardianship case. The people donating to the GoFundMe did not know that they were donating to Tonia’s legal fund. Tonia got Guardianship which became a five-year nightmare for Mike and his mother Janet. Mike was receiving substandard care in both nursing homes he was in. The first nursing home he was in was in Plymouth Meeting, Pa.
Things there were pretty bad and Janet was speaking up about these things, but Tonia didn’t want to hear it. Eventually Mike was moved to a facility in King of Prussia, Pa. Things there were much, much worse.
Mike’s court appointed attorney was named Dev. Janet was trying to tell them information about what was happening in the nursing home but Dev just wanted to sweep that information under the rug. Dev did nothing at all to help protect Mike or his assets and Mike was not getting services that he needed. Dev was more concerned with helping Tonia and the nursing homes.
Mike’s mother Janet and our side of the family had always believed that Tonia wanted to steal Mike’s assets and that she would eventually let him die.
An evaluation was done of Mike in 2021 which was mentioned in the letter below.
The lady that did the evaluation said that Mike wouldn’t progress much past where he was in 2021.
But she was wrong.
By late 2023, early 2024 Mike had made an incredible amount of progress. He was doing great, but I don’t think Tonia was too happy with that. You will read in the letter below how the nursing home said that up until that time (May) Mike was never sick. And he wasn’t. By this time Tonia and the nursing home had gotten rid of Janet and they had left Mike just lying there in bed. Mike did start to get sick, and it was around this time his Peg tube fell out. He didn’t have any of these medical problems before that. By June 3, 2024 he was in the hospital for the first time since moving to the nursing home in King of Prussia.
Tonia had to sell the house before Mike died or Medicare and Medicaid could have put a lien on the house to recover some of the costs for treating Mike. Tonia finally sold the house and settlement was scheduled for October 2024. The house sold for $395,000. His half of the house money could have been used to pay for the physical therapy he needed to learn how to walk again but it wasn’t. Tonia wanted Mike’s half of the money they got from the house and once she got it she didn’t need Mike anymore. She had taken everything she could take from Mike. At this point I don’t think he had any assets left to take except for what was left from his social security check after the nursing home was paid for which amounted to about $7000-$8000 for the following year until he died. Tonia took this as well.
When people are left lying in bed for long periods of time they develop infections and this started happening to Mike. By December 2024 Mike started suffering from repeated infections and he began going to the hospital on a regular basis. He was admitted 11 times in 13 months.
When Tonia and the nursing home got rid of Janet they were setting Mike up for this. Tonia left him lying there isolated and alone for the next two years.
Tonia spent the last five years relieving Mike of his assets and she is now letting him die. There were three attorneys and four judges involved in this case and not only did they let Tonia steal Mike’s assets, they also helped her do it! Tonia hadn’t done the inventory of Mike’s assets that she was required to do as Guardian. When asked about Mike’s assets, Tonia would hem and she’d haw and say she doesn’t remember, she would have to check. Neither Tonia nor her attorney ever answered these questions about Mike’s assets directly. Their answers were always evasive. Mike’s attorney never demanded to see an accounting of his assets and neither did the court.
Most of the court hearings that were held were more about Tonia and what Tonia wanted then about Mike and what he needed.
There were numerous complaints made to protective services about Mike and the horrific conditions he was living with. But, as always, protective services ‘didn’t see nothing’. The State Department was also contacted about Mike and about the things that were happening in that nursing home. They didn’t do anything to help. The Attorney General was contacted and even though they had investigated Genesis HealthCare before, who were the owners of the nursing home in King of Prussia, the Attorney General did nothing to help Mike. They had investigated Genesis HealthCare for providing substandard care, lawsuits and wrongful deaths, but they never put Genesis out of business. It probably wouldn’t have mattered though. Genesis would have just changed their name pretending to be a new company and continued the maiming and killing in these nursing homes. And that is exactly what they’ve done.
The District Attorney was also sent information about what was happening to Mike. He didn’t do anything to help Mike either. I’m inclined to believe that he was more concerned with protecting the lawyers, judges and agencies involved than in helping and protecting Mike.
Mike died yesterday on March 5, 2026. His mother Janet saw him for her one hour supervised visit on Wednesday the 4th of March and saw he was getting oxygen, but nobody told her why. Tonia did not tell her that Mike was dying or let her stay with him while died. He died in the very early hours of Thursday March 5th most likely between midnight and 1:30 am. Tonia was at the nursing home Wednesday evening, but she didn’t tell his mother anything until after he died and even then she didn’t tell her much of anything. She wouldn’t tell her what time he died or what caused his death. Then Janet went to the funeral home to see if she could see him, but Tonia said she couldn’t see him. She told Janet that she would have to wait until the next day. Tonia is a narcissist and she has always been very, very cruel.
All these people involved should be held criminally responsible for his death. They all played a role in allowing all this to happen. If any of these people had done their job then Mike would still be alive and thriving today, but the people mentioned above and the courts are totally corrupt and they always have been.
The hearings having to do with this Guardianship over the last five years were held at a courthouse in West Chester, Pa.
I am using initials or shortened names so some parties can’t be identified.
This is the letter that I sent to the 4th judge involved in the case, Judge M., after Tonia had filed a petition to be able to make End-of-Life decisions for Mike. The petition was approved. The judge sentenced Mike to death.
30 January 2026
Good Afternoon Your Honor,
I am writing to you in reference to the End-of-Life hearing for Mike that was recently held. My name is Car and I am Mike’s aunt and Janet’s sister. Together Janet and I had tried to get Guardianship of Mike back in 2021 but we were not successful. I was not a party to the End-of-Life hearing, but I would still like to have my say which is why I am writing this letter to you.
I need to give you some history first but as you read you will see why I have contacted your office. Mike is 47 years old and a resident at a nursing home in King of Prussia. Mike had his accident on September 25, 2020. Tonia was divorcing Mike and she should have never been given guardianship of a man she was divorcing.
Janet and I both submitted paperwork to apply to be Mike’s guardian and we had to represent ourselves in court which I’m sure you know doesn’t work out but we could not afford an attorney, but we had to at least try and do something. Prior to the hearing Janet talked on the phone with Mike’s court appointed attorney Dev on 2 occasions. She thought that he was working in Mike’s best interest, so she wanted to give him some history. The first phone call he had told Janet that he didn’t think Tonia was working in Mike’s best interest and shouldn’t be guardian but I’m not sure how long that call lasted or what else was said. On the second phone call he was supporting Tonia as guardian. I am Janet’s sister and I was sitting right next to Janet and Dev is quite loud on the phone, so I heard what was being said. Janet was telling Dev about Tonia taking money from the GoFundMe and using it for her legal fees as well as the divorce which was almost complete. Dev kept bringing the conversation back to what Tonia’s responsibilities as guardian were going to be. Every time Janet talked about Tonia, he continued to keep bringing the conversation back to Tonia’s responsibilities and the role she would play as guardian.
Tonia had told Janet that she had taken money from the GoFundMe to pay her legal fees for the guardianship. She had also told Janet that Pete, the administrator of the GoFundMe account, still owed her $1000. She said if she lost at the guardianship hearing then she would have use her own money to fight it.
In court I asked Tonia if she took money from the GoFundMe to pay her legal fees. She said ‘just a little bit’. She said she did take money for her initial lawyer fees because it was for Mike. I asked her if she was supposed to take money from any fund that people are donating to for a specific purpose. She said it was for the guardianship of Mike as though that made it okay to steal money from this fund.
Neither Judge O. nor any of the attorney’s said a word when Tonia was asked and admitted she had taken money from GoFundMe to pay for her legal fees for the guardianship. This GoFundMe was started and managed by Pete, and it was set up to pay for Mike’s house, mortgage and utilities, and support of his kids. Tonia said it wasn’t just for that but it was just for that.
Those people donating money to this GoFundMe were betrayed, thinking they were donating to help Mike’s family, not knowing they were really donating to Tonia’s legal fund. At the time I think it cost $4000 – $5000 for a guardianship hearing so I believe the amount of money she looted the GoFundMe for was substantial. Tonia’s attorney at the time was Matt. He was the original benefactor of the stolen funds though the other attorney, Dev, and the judge all knew she had taken this money.
According to the Office of Professional Responsibility these lawyers should have backed off and refused to participate when they knew that a Fraud had been committed but they did not. They never said a word about it.
Towards the end of the Guardianship hearing Mike’s attorney, Dev, said to Tonia ‘There is the issue of the divorce case being filed and your separation. You do understand that you need to keep all of your assets separate from Mike’s, correct? If appointed guardian, you will be required to report to the court relative to any of his finances…Are you willing to do that?’ Tonia said ‘yes’. He said, ‘Mike’s accounts should not be comingled with yours’.
I think that’s the only time in the last five years that anyone has ever said anything about her divorce and the need to keep Mike’s accounts separate from hers. Which she has not done.
From the beginning I knew Tonia was going to use her Guardianship of Mike to get her revenge on both Janet and Mike.
Tonia was told by the court to keep Janet updated on Mike’s condition which she really never did. Even in the beginning when she was sharing information about Mike she wasn’t sharing much of it and she made Janet work to get what little she got. Tonia eventually told Janet that she didn’t have to tell her anything. She said she agreed with Judge O. that she would keep Janet informed but she said that Judge O. is no longer their judge, so she doesn’t have to tell Janet anything now.
Tonia had started a group chat which she said would be used to provide updates on Mike but what she really used it for them to gang up on and attack Janet. When Janet would ask a question or respond to a text Tonia, Mack (Mike’s son and the other guardian), Jac (mother of 2 of MR’s kids) and Mic (MR’s girlfriend at time of accident) would pounce on Janet like a pack of rabid dogs. They were gaslighting her. Tonia and her 3 sidekicks loved to antagonize and torment Janet and they’ve done it for years. The group chat stopped being used a while back but Tonia continues to gaslight Janet. She will say and make up anything she has to in order to keep Janet away from Mike. This is how she gets her revenge.
Tonia has also tried to extort money from Janet. On the group chat she said she was going to make an appointment for Mike to have his shunt checked out. After she posted that Jac said “So…” and Tonia said “??” and Jac said “Call me.” Shortly after that Tonia gets back on the chat and starts telling Janet that she can’t afford Mike’s appointment and can Janet contribute some money. Then Jac, Tonia and Mic started pretending that they were all going to contribute money for the appointment and Jac said to Janet that her boss can contribute half the money for Mike’s appointment if Janet could pay the rest which could be about $250.00. Tonia had said the total cost could be $520. ‘After all he’s your son Janet’ Then Tonia said she would even take $5.00. They were trying to shake her down for more than $5.00. Janet didn’t have any money.
Tonia also mentioned that Mike’s GoFundMe had next to nothing in it and we know that’s because Tonia had already looted the fund. I saw that my son Jer offered to give Tonia money and I texted him and said “Jer, don’t give her any money. There is something really gamey going on here.” He ended up not giving her any money.
Then a week later Tonia was scheduling people to visit Mike.
Tonia said:
“Glad your phone works about visits and covid but not about helping to pay for your sons appointment.”
Janet said “I am aware that they are having the first two visits. I would like to go the following week as I mentioned, on the 30th. Thank you.”
Tonia said “I’ll worry about your visit once you can respond about Mike’s appointment that I asked you about last week. I’ve still had yet to get a response from you.”
Tonia said that she’ll worry about Janet’s visit when she hears back from Janet about whether she would give her money for Mike’s appointment. Mike has a medical card which should have paid for his appointment as well as transportation.
Extortion is a criminal offense. Just like Fraud is.
At one point Janet asked Tonia if she would add my son Jer to the group so he could get updates. In the beginning she said no. Later she did add him to the group chat.
When Tonia was first asked to add Jer she responded:
“I don’t give a fuck what you tell other people because you only tell what you want them to hear, you only say what makes yourself look good and you are the most two faced human being on the face of this earth, You talk shit on every single person yet smile in their face. No more.
Just like you’re all talk behind a cell phone yet you choke up in person.
I will not update a single person that you demand I update. Why? I guess I have the power not to do so right? You have not seen power yet but hang tight!”
Since you seem to not get my messages, I hope Car can relay all of my messages to you.
Leave Mike the fuck alone at this point. Lose my number. You’re on your own.”
Tonia had said “You have not seen power yet but hang tight!”
And as we know, the best was yet to come.
Tonia wrote this in another group chat:
“She has an issue with me ‘legal wife’ then I’m thinking about signing over my rights to his new girlfriend that can’t stand Janet either. Janet still won’t have any rights so
But maybe his new girlfriend will know more about Mike than me I guess
Janet will still be in the same situation she is in now. No rights. And no information being given to her because Mic won’t speak with her either.”
Mic was Mike’s fiancé at the time of the accident.
Mike would have never wanted Tonia to be his guardian. He wanted her out of his life and had planned to remarry when the divorce was final. As guardians Tonia and Mack are supposed to be doing the things Mike would have wanted them to do but they don’t. They do what they want to do. We already knew when we got in to court for this hearing that the decision about who was going to be Mike’s guardian had already been decided.
We believe Judge O. made Tonia Mike’s guardian as a professional courtesy to Tonia’s mother who had been a magistrate for a long time. Her mother’s name is RA.
Mike was at ACare for a good while and there were a lot of issues with employees being nasty and not doing their jobs there, but the nursing home Mike eventually moved to, a King of Prussia nursing home, is much worse. The employees at this King of Prussia nursing home wanted to get rid of Janet because she ‘complained too much’ and they were afraid Janet could cause them to lose their licenses. And they should have lost them. They said Janet was getting in the way of the staff doing their jobs and that she was harassing them. But that wasn’t true.
All Janet ever wanted from the nursing home was for them to do their jobs, but they would not do their jobs. According to the Rules for Nursing Homes who Receive Medicare and Medicaid, nursing homes can’t punish a resident or their advocates for complaining about the care received in that facility so Mike’s court appointed attorney Dev decided he would do the punishing. As Mike’s court appointed attorney, he should have been working in Mike’s best interest, but he never has. He has, however, always worked in Tonia’s and the nursing homes best interests even though Tonia has her own lawyer. Her lawyer’s name is Kris. Mike’s lawyer Dev should have listened to what Janet was saying, and he should have been appalled at the conditions Mike was living under but instead he decided he was going to punish Janet and sweep those allegations under the rug. All he wanted to do was bury that information.
Tonia and the nursing home were desperate to get rid of Janet. Tonia because she hates Janet’s guts and the nursing home employees because they didn’t want anyone drawing attention to the fact that they weren’t doing their jobs so together they came up with a way to get rid of Janet once and for all. They decided they would accuse Janet of endangering Mike’s life, and they did this with no evidence whatsoever that Janet ever did anything to endanger Mike’s life. And bam, Janet was finally gone.
These are the situations they’ve used to ‘prove’ that Janet was endangering Mike’s life. In April (2024? ) someone had come around offering all the residents ice cream. Since the person was coming around offering ice cream Janet thought it was okay to get some for Mike. Then they accused Janet of endangering Mike’s life by giving him ice cream. A nursing home is supposed to provide a safe environment for their residents and allowing an employee to go around offering ice cream to residents without telling them who can have it and who can’t is not providing a safe environment. Who does that? The nursing home screwed up. That was their fault not Janet’s. Janet didn’t know he couldn’t have ice cream because nobody ever tells her anything.
The Director of Nursing said she saw Janet in line for ice cream and thought she was getting it for herself. Sure she did. Even though Trish saw Janet in line she never even stepped up to say that if she was getting the ice cream for Mike he couldn’t have it. She never said a word to Janet.
Even though it wasn’t Janet’s fault, the nursing home watched him for three days to make sure he didn’t aspirate it into his lungs, and they said Mike was fine. When someone aspirates something into their lungs you see evidence of it within three days.
They had reduced Janet’s visitation so she went into court to see if she could have it increased but she ended up with one hour supervised visitation a week because she was ‘endangering Mike’s life’. But that wasn’t true. Tonia and the nursing home have been the ones endangering Mike’s life.
At some point they put Mike back on a feeding tube and I’m not sure why since he had been eating pureed food by mouth for some time.
Then one day Janet had come to see Mike and saw that the feeding tube had come out. She told someone and right away they accused Janet of pulling it out but she hadn’t. She was again accused of endangering Mike’s life. Janet has never done anything to endanger her son’s life. Never. For the last four years Janet had been there almost every single day, providing him stimulation, keeping him clean, protecting him and advocating for him. Janet was the only person taking care of him. Janet is the person who should be given the credit for most of the progress he has made.
What most likely happened was that the Peg tube fell out because it was deflated which would have caused him to aspirate the liquid food into his lungs and that would have caused him to develope a fever and Pneumonia.
She, the Director of Nursing Trish, went on to talk about how traumatic it was for a patient to have a feeding tube inserted. She said they REINSERTED the Peg tube.
So if they had reinserted the Peg tube, and did it correctly, then why was the Peg tube deflated 3 or so weeks later when Mike was sent to the hospital on June 3, 2024? Obviously someone forgot to either inflate the Peg tube or they were reinserting a defective peg tube.
One of the reasons Mike went to the hospital on June 3, 2024 was because his Peg tube was deflated. When a Peg tube is deflated it allows the liquid food to be aspirated into the lungs and most likely this is what Mike was aspirating into his lungs. It had nothing to do with the ice cream. You can bet this Peg tube didn’t just deflate the day Mike went to the hospital and was most likely an ongoing problem.
That bull about her endangering Mike’s life was fabricated by Tonia and the nursing home and designed to get Janet out of the picture and keep her out. And it worked.
The Director of Nursing, Trish, said that on one day that Janet had her visit that the staff called her later and said Mike had abnormal vital signs and a fever. She went on to say that as long as Mike had been there, he has never been sick even in regard to his diagnosis from his accident. She said it was pretty strange on the 2 times Janet did visit that he ended up in a ‘change of condition’. One from Peg tube coming out and then this one was him ( Mike) running a fever and needing to go on antibiotics. She neglected to mention that Janet had also been there for Mike every day during that period of time since he had been there and Mike had never been sick.
Trish said she didn’t want to allege that Janet was responsible for this because they don’t know for sure. But that is exactly what she was doing. She was alleging that Janet had done this.
In the text Tonia sent to Jam she said:
“If you have something to say, say it. Making lies for attention and Facebook is insane.
Living off of Mike? One thing you and your family need to know is the laws. Principal can’t be touched. Any money Mike had prior to his accident can’t be touched.
You sound and act just like Jan.
All any of you had to do was call me quick but you couldn’t.
The reason that no visitor policy had to be put in place was because of Janet and Janet only unfortunately. What’s she’s done to Mike is despicable! Go talk to her for the fucking rules Jam!
Be a fucking adult.
Coming from someone who rarely EVER visits Mike.
Good job with your pos (Protective Services) complaint you put in too. They laughed. Especially coming from someone who doesn’t see Mike.
Your mother too.
You guys are all pieces of shit. Exactly why Mike wasn’t talking to any of you.”
There has never been a time that Mike wasn’t talking to Jam and I and Mike and Janet have fought like cats and dogs all their lives, so it wasn’t unusual that there were periods of time that they weren’t talking. That’s what happens when you have 2 very opinionated individuals together.
When Mike finally got to the hospital on June 3, 2024 he was emaciated from rapid weight loss, he was aspirating something into his lungs, his Peg tube was deflated, he had a fever and Pneumonia and he had a collapsed lung. He had to have been in agony. Tonia would not let Janet see him in the hospital. Tonia was frantic and desperate to make sure the hospital knew that his condition was all Janet’s fault because she had given him ice cream. She wanted to make sure it was in his medical records at the nursing home as well as at the hospital. Tonia had the momentum going and she wasn’t stopping. But here’s the thing about the ice cream. Tonia was trying to say that this incident that happened six weeks prior to this hospitalization was responsible for Mike’s condition now (June 3, 2025) and that it was Janet’s fault but the nursing home admitted in that Mike was not injured from the ice cream and Tonia knew that.
After Mike was admitted to the hospital Tonia and the other guardian, Mike’s son Mack, were sending Janet nasty texts about the horrific thing she did to Mike that caused him to be hospitalized (the ice cream). Tonia even had one of the doctors send a letter to Dev (Mike’s attorney) that said the ice cream could have been a cause. That doctor is either incompetent or he’s a liar. The ice cream incident happened somewhere around April 17th and Mike was taken to the hospital on June 3, 2024. You don’t eat something you’re not supposed to and then get sick six weeks later.
Janet is not responsible for him aspirating anything into his lungs and getting Pneumonia this time nor last time nor any time before. I guess they can’t blame her now since it keeps happening even though she isn’t there.
Janet’s one hour supervised visits are held in the lobby or some other common room. They don’t let Janet in Mike’s room, they don’t let Janet examine Mike and check him over, and they don’t allow her to take any pictures. They don’t want Janet to see anything because they have a lot to hide.
On July 9, 2025, the owner of the nursing home, Genesis HealthCare, filed for bankruptcy.
Genesis was providing substandard care in their nursing homes and facing an increasing number of lawsuits for personal injury and wrongful deaths. This is why the nursing home staff were desperate to get rid of Janet. Janet was a witness to what was going on in this nursing home, and she was speaking up about it so she had to go. The accusations they made against Janet endangering Mike’s life were false allegations. They were not true.
By Dietrich Knauth
Jan 20 (Reuters) – Bankrupt Genesis Health received court approval on Tuesday to sell its nursing homes to an outside buyer for $1 billion, just over a month after a U.S. bankruptcy judge rejected a previous offer from company insiders.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stacey Jernigan approved the sale of the company’s 175 nursing homes to NewGen Health, a California-based healthcare provider, at a court hearing in Dallas, Texas, bankruptcy court.
….Genesis, which operates 175 skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities in 18 U.S. states, filed for bankruptcy on July 9 with more than $2.3 billion in debt.
The company blamed its bankruptcy on high debt that it racked up during a period of expansion and acquisition, difficulty in retaining nursing staff, and a growing number of lawsuits over the quality of healthcare at its facilities….
Nursing homes have a long gruesome history of killing off their residents and that continues to this day. I’ve had a Paramedic tell me not long ago that in just the last couple years they have pulled many, many sick people out of nursing homes and this is just in Lancaster and Chester County. People with bedsores eating into their spines, people not being treated, people being starved to death, etc. She said the people living in these nursing homes live in appalling conditions. Paramedics call nursing homes ‘the place people go to die’. They know the horrific things that happen to people in these facilities. This paramedic said that a colleague told her about a recent call to a nursing home. The nursing home had said that they were getting abnormal vitals or readings for this resident. When the paramedics got there, they found a resident who had been lying there dead for hours. The paramedic said the nursing home was surprised.
Janet and I both had concerns about Mike’s attorney Dev. We never thought that he was working in Mike’s best interest. We have always believed that the only person whose best interest he worked in was Tonia’s.
An attorney Janet was working with for a while, Tom, sent Janet an email and in the email, he states “I think Dev (Mike’s attorney and one of the opposing council) is appropriately representing his client who is incapacitated. As I have tried to explain to you the other day, based on what I’ve seen so far, the prospects of Mike improving beyond his current situation appears unlikely. Early on Judge A. listened to your concerns and went the extra step of having an independent person evaluate Mike at court expense. That person didn’t see Mike as being able to progress much beyond where he was in 2021. Again, based on what I’ve seen so far, after that it looks like the court concluded that your expectations for Mike were unrealistic and moved away from your concerns.” (end)
But here’s the problem with ‘evaluations’. Neither the judges, lawyers or the so-called ‘professionals’ (doctors and evaluators) have any way to predict someone’s outcome. If they tell you they can then they are lying. What they do is write an evaluation it’s often a death sentence for these patients. Neither their families or anyone else will do anything to help these patients because they think it’s hopeless. I believe there are many people in these nursing homes who could have improved significantly if they had received the help they needed. But instead, they use their warm bodies to fill these beds, and these bodies are left lying there until they eventually die.
Our expectations for Mike were not unrealistic.
In truth, Mike had already progressed WAY beyond where he was in 2021. From 2023 until early 2024 there was great improvement in Mike’s condition and he was making steady progress. He was also mouthing words.
As you can see from the pictures I provided Mike was doing great. Mike can understand what people are saying to him and he can also read.
I don’t think Tonia was too happy about the progress Mike was making. She couldn’t steal his assets if he was getting better, so she had to get rid of the one person responsible for most of that progress. His mother.
I’m sure you know money is powerful motivation when it comes to murder. Tonia also wanted Janet out of the way so she couldn’t interfere with Tonia letting Mike die.
First Degree Murder : Willfulness, premeditation, and malice forethought. Wanting someone dead for your benefit and it’s planned in advance to make sure the death happens.
What Tonia and the nursing home have done to Mike is criminal and if Mike dies, they should all be held responsible for his death. This is incompetence and neglect and none of this is related to his injuries from the accident.
My son has always been very close to Mike. Not long ago I said to him “You know Tonia wants Mike to die, right?” And he nodded his head a few times and said “Yep”. I love my nephew and I don’t want to see him die but he will if nobody steps in to help him.
Janet said that when she went to see Mike for her one hour supervised visit on Jan 1, 2025 the feeding tube from the bag down to Mike’s body was caked with liquid feed and the food container on the pole was covered up. His pillow cases were saturated with the liquid food but the employees didn’t seem too concerned about. I believe they did this on purpose to upset Janet because they know that Janet knows there is not a thing she can do about it. Janet asked them to get clean linens and stuff to clean it up. And of course, I’m sure the employees have said ‘Janet’s complaining again’. Janet is a target of Tonia and the nursing home and Mike is as well.
When Janet was at the hospital on Jan 9, 2025 the nurse was turning Mike and Janet saw a big bedsore on his back. Bedsores can eat into the bone and kill someone. He also had a large square bandage in between his shoulder blades. Janet asked what that was and the nurse told her it was a ‘wound’ but the nurse said they didn’t know how it happened so it must have happened at the nursing home.
At this point I think Mike may be losing his will to live.
In early 2025 Tonia had placed a DNR order on Mike. When Janet asked Tonia about it she told Janet something about not wanting Mike to have to lay in a bed the rest of his life. Mike wouldn’t be lying in bed if Tonia had gotten him the services he needed to be able to walk. Tonia likes to pretend that Mike would never walk again but Dr S. at Moss Rehab told Janet that Mike can walk again.
Tonia said Bryn Mawr Rehab wouldn’t take Mike but that’s not true either. Bryn Mawr Rehab said they WOULD take Mike.
By getting rid of Janet Tonia isolated Mike. She has left Mike isolated and alone for two years now. When someone is left lying in a bed for years, they can develop many infections which could kill them. This is what Tonia has done to Mike, and it certainly wasn’t in Mike’s best interest. Only in Tonia’s best interest. This is what Tonia wanted for Mike. I know Tonia would claim that he isn’t alone and he gets visitors, but he certainly doesn’t get many and these visitors aren’t there to provide stimulation for him, to talk to him and keep him company. As of right now Mike has been hospitalized eleven times in the last thirteen months.
Two years that Mike didn’t get to spend with his mother nor she with him. Two years in which Mike could have been well on his way to walking and talking. Instead, he was left just lying there.
What was done to Mike and Janet was HORRIFIC.
Mike doesn’t have to die. What Mike needs and has always needed was a new Guardian. Someone who will take care of him, get him the services he needs and who will work in his best interest. Someone who will get him out of that nursing home and into one who will provide the care he needs. Giving Mike a tracheotomy might also be necessary. At least it will give the opportunity to keep his lungs suctioned while he gets the treatments he needs to treat and hopefully heal any infections he has.
Tonia and Mack should not have the authority to make End-of-Life decisions for Mike. Tonia is a good example of why a spouse should never be given Guardianship of a spouse she’s divorcing. It’s always about the money and how one spouse has to die for the other spouse to get it.
Car A.H.
The dates on the pictures that Janet took are accurate dates and they were taken in 2023. The dates on the pictures from Jamie are the dates that she sent them to me not the dates the pictures were taken.
By Dietrich Knauth
Jan 20 (Reuters) – Bankrupt Genesis Health received court approval on Tuesday to sell its nursing homes to an outside buyer for $1 billion, just over a month after a U.S. bankruptcy judge rejected a previous offer from company insiders.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stacey Jernigan approved the sale of the company’s 175 nursing homes to NewGen Health, a California-based healthcare provider, at a court hearing in Dallas, Texas, bankruptcy court.
The company’s latest auction of its assets had included several “unusual” steps aimed at addressing creditors’ questions about the fairness and transparency of an earlier auction, Jernigan said. To resolve those concerns, Genesis produced a public transcript of the auction proceedings and created a more active role for creditors’ representatives and a mediator, Jernigan said.
“I cannot imagine a process that would bring in more integrity than all of this combined,” Jernigan said.
Genesis, which operates 175 skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities in 18 U.S. states, filed for bankruptcy on July 9 with more than $2.3 billion in debt.
The company blamed its bankruptcy on high debt that it racked up during a period of expansion and acquisition, difficulty in retaining nursing staff, and a growing number of lawsuits over the quality of healthcare at its facilities….
…The Genesis bankruptcy filings list $708.5 million in secured debt, which the company proposes to satisfy through the sale of its assets to a “stalking horse bidder” affiliated with the primary secured creditors. The bankruptcy petition also lists nearly $800 million in unsecured debt to creditors who include the Internal Revenue Service, vendors and the recipients of legal settlements.
….“In the case of Genesis HealthCare, this is another private equity-backed health care organization that has bled dry by greed and mismanagement. Genesis owes the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania – and its taxpayers – $58 million, and like every taxpaying-resident of Pennsylvania, they should pay their fair share,” Cwalina said.
….The company’s legacy costs, which include $8 million a month in settlement and defense costs associated with personal injury and wrongful death claims, proved insurmountable, the court papers say….
Genesis Deal Shows Faltering Nursing Sector’s Complex Money Web
Jan. 28, 2026, 5:00 AM EST
James Nani
Reporter
The tumultuous process of selling bankrupt Genesis Healthcare Inc.’s nursing-home empire offers a rare peek into the small, obscure world of nursing home ownership and lending.
The pending sale to an affiliate of health-care consulting firm New Generation Health LLC, or NewGen, is valued at nearly $1 billion, but came together only after offers from other private equity-backed bidders—some of whom had insider ties and were angling for liability releases—fell short.
While the sale, which could close by spring, marks a win for Genesis and a significant expansion for NewGen, it revealed an industry shaped by consolidation, distress, complexity, and a small circle of recurring players.
…Although NewGen wasn’t labeled an insider, it also had ties to Genesis. The companies were partners in a venture involving 29 nursing homes, and the sale includes $57.5 million to resolve issues from that enterprise.
Welltower, a major Genesis landlord and senior lender, said it had “virtually no information regarding the buyer, their capital structure, their projections, or their track record” related to NewGen’s ability to transition and run the homes.
…Corporate Layers
Complex structures and LLCs are sometimes used to shield owners and lenders or avoid regulatory scrutiny, Carroll said.
The Genesis sale underscores how ownership can be layered through related companies that separate operations from real estate and management, adding complexity for creditors and regulators.
“We’ve consistently found how complex business structures and the opaque nature of the private equity industry obscured nursing home ownership, making it difficult for regulators to adequately track impacts and assess compliance,” said Matt Parr of advocacy group Private Equity Stakeholder Project.
Private equity money has become key as the sector has faced years of insolvency that’s expected to worsen with rising labor costs and the 2025 GOP tax law.
“The problem with most of the nursing homes that I have dealt with have a shortage of operating funds caused by a gap in the reimbursement rate for Medicaid and Medicare,” said Robert E. Chernicoff of Cunningham, Chernicoff & Warshawsky PC…..
<<<<….Over time a growing number of abuse and neglect claims as well as wrongful deaths were occurring in this facility and Genesis filed for bankruptcy. Genesis was then sold to a company called NewGen Health. Guess who owns that company? The same people who owned Genesis. Now they can continue the maiming and killing in their nursing homes but do it under a new name. It should be a while before the continuing crimes in these nursing homes become apparent to other people. Then the cycle will begin again. Phony investigations, lawsuits, then another company (same one) buying the nursing homes.